1963 Cal 40 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

1963 Cal 401963 Cal 40
VS
1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Cal 401984 Moody 33
General
ManufacturerCalMoody
Year1963–19721984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerBill LapworthBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,030 kg (15,498 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.3 m² (660 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1963 Cal 40 is 2.13m longer than the 1984 Moody 33. The 1963 Cal 40 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1963 Cal 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1963 Cal 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · 1984 Moody 33