1963 Cal 40 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison
1963 Cal 40
1995 Feeling 39
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1963 Cal 40 | 1995 Feeling 39 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Cal | Feeling |
| Year | 1963–1972 | 1995–2003 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | Bill Lapworth | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) | 11.80 m (38.7 ft) |
| LWL | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 3.78 m (12.4 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,030 kg (15,498 lbs) | 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) | 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 61.3 m² (660 ft²) | 66.0 m² (710 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1963 Cal 40 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1963 Cal 40 is 0.39m longer than the 1995 Feeling 39. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.