1963 Cal 40 vs 2007 Moody 46 — Comparison

1963 Cal 401963 Cal 40
VS
2007 Moody 46

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Cal 402007 Moody 46
General
ManufacturerCalMoody
Year1963–19722007–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerBill LapworthBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)13.95 m (45.8 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)12.30 m (40.4 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)4.49 m (14.7 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.89 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,030 kg (15,498 lbs)14,500 kg (31,967 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.3 m² (660 ft²)96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)300 L (79.3 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)500 L (132.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
2007 Moody 46
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
2007 Moody 46
35.86
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
2007 Moody 46
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
2007 Moody 46
18.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and 2007 Moody 46 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the 2007 Moody 46 is a 2000s offering from Moody from Germany. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The 2007 Moody 46 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2007 Moody 46 at 13.95m (45.8ft) with a 4.49m beam. The 2007 Moody 46 is 1.76m longer than the 1963 Cal 40. The 2007 Moody 46 displaces approximately 106% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The 2007 Moody 46, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 96.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1963 Cal 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 2007 Moody 46 has a comfort ratio of 18.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 35.9% for the 2007 Moody 46, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2007 Moody 46 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 500L water and 300L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1963 Cal 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2007 Moody 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · 2007 Moody 46