1963 Cal 40 vs Hanse 375 — Comparison

1963 Cal 40 1963 Cal 40
VS
Hanse 375 Hanse 375

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1963 Cal 40 Hanse 375
General
Manufacturer Cal Hanse
Year 1963–1972 2009–2015
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Bill Lapworth judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 12.19 m (40.0 ft) 11.35 m (37.2 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 10.05 m (33.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.65 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,030 kg (15,498 lbs) 7,000 kg (15,432 lbs)
Ballast 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 2,150 kg (4,740 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 61.3 m² (660 ft²) 62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 29 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 130 L (34.3 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
Hanse 375
17.21
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
Hanse 375
30.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
Hanse 375
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
Hanse 375
17.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and Hanse 375 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Hanse 375 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Hanse 375 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Hanse 375 at 11.35m (37.2ft) with a 3.65m beam. The 1963 Cal 40 is 0.84m longer than the Hanse 375. The 1963 Cal 40 displaces approximately 0% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The Hanse 375, with an SA/D of 17.21 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 375 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Hanse 375 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 30.7% for the Hanse 375, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 375 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L water and 130L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 375 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS