1963 Cal 40 vs Catalina 440 — Comparison

1963 Cal 401963 Cal 40
VS
Catalina 440

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Cal 40Catalina 440
General
ManufacturerCalCatalina
Year1963–19722010–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBill LapworthGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.73 m (38.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)4.14 m (13.6 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.96 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,030 kg (15,498 lbs)10,886 kg (23,999 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.3 m² (660 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)379 L (100.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
Catalina 440
16.96
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
Catalina 440
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
Catalina 440
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
Catalina 440
16.84

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and Catalina 440 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Catalina 440 is a modern offering from Catalina from USA. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Catalina 440 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Catalina 440 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.14m beam. The Catalina 440 is 1.22m longer than the 1963 Cal 40. The Catalina 440 displaces approximately 55% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The Catalina 440, with an SA/D of 16.96 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1963 Cal 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Catalina 440 has a comfort ratio of 16.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 37.5% for the Catalina 440, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Catalina 440 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L water and 189L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1963 Cal 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 440 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · Catalina 440