1963 Contessa 26 vs 1998 Dehler 29 — Comparison
1963 Contessa 26
1998 Dehler 29
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1963 Contessa 26 | 1998 Dehler 29 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Jeremy Rogers | Dehler |
| Year | 1963–1980 | 1998–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | Germany |
| Designer | David Sadler | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.80 m (25.6 ft) | 8.82 m (28.9 ft) |
| LWL | 5.79 m (19.0 ft) | 7.60 m (24.9 ft) |
| Beam | 2.29 m (7.5 ft) | 2.95 m (9.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) | 1.55 m (5.1 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 3,200 kg (7,055 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs) | 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 26.0 m² (280 ft²) | 35.0 m² (377 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 7 HP | 14 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 23 L (6.1 gal) | 40 L (10.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1963 Contessa 26 and 1998 Dehler 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Contessa 26 is a classic design by Jeremy Rogers from UK, while the 1998 Dehler 29 is a 1990s offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1963 Contessa 26 was penned by David Sadler. The 1998 Dehler 29 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the 1963 Contessa 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.29m, compared to the 1998 Dehler 29 at 8.82m (28.9ft) with a 2.95m beam. The 1998 Dehler 29 is 1.02m longer than the 1963 Contessa 26. The 1998 Dehler 29 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1963 Contessa 26 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.31 and 26.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Dehler 29, with an SA/D of 16.38 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Dehler 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1963 Contessa 26 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1998 Dehler 29 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 46.0% for the 1963 Contessa 26 and 37.5% for the 1998 Dehler 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1963 Contessa 26 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 45L of water capacity and 23L of fuel. The 1998 Dehler 29 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 80L water and 40L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1963 Contessa 26 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1998 Dehler 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1998 Dehler 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.