1965 Pearson Vanguard vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1965 Pearson Vanguard1965 Pearson Vanguard
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Pearson Vanguard1982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerPearsonWesterly
Year1965–19721982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerPhilip RhodesEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.83 m (32.3 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
14.32
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
41.11
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
0.71
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
25.31
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is 0.33m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Pearson Vanguard · 1982 Westerly Konsort