1965 Pearson Vanguard vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison
1965 Pearson Vanguard
1990 Feeling 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1965 Pearson Vanguard | 1990 Feeling 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Feeling |
| Year | 1965–1972 | 1990–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | Philip Rhodes | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.83 m (32.3 ft) | 9.85 m (32.3 ft) |
| LWL | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) | 8.20 m (26.9 ft) |
| Beam | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) | 1.50 m (4.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) | 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 36.0 m² (388 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 0.02m longer than the 1965 Pearson Vanguard. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Feeling 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1990 Feeling 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1965 Pearson Vanguard · 1990 Feeling 32