1965 Pearson Vanguard vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

1965 Pearson Vanguard1965 Pearson Vanguard
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Pearson Vanguard1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerPearsonWauquiez
Year1965–19721990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerPhilip RhodesJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA9.83 m (32.3 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
14.32
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
41.11
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
0.71
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
25.31
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is 0.08m longer than the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Pearson Vanguard · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32