1966 Islander 33 vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison

1966 Islander 33 1966 Islander 33
VS
1972 Contest 31 1972 Contest 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1966 Islander 33 1972 Contest 31
General
Manufacturer Islander Contest
Year 1966–1974 1972–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Netherlands
Designer Joseph McGlasson Dick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 42.0 m² (452 ft²) 39.5 m² (425 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Steel
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1966 Islander 33
15.57
1972 Contest 31
14.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1966 Islander 33
39.99
1972 Contest 31
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1966 Islander 33
0.72
1972 Contest 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1966 Islander 33
23.44
1972 Contest 31
23.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1966 Islander 33 and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1966 Islander 33 is a classic design by Islander from USA, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1966 Islander 33 was penned by Joseph McGlasson. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1966 Islander 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1966 Islander 33 is 0.61m longer than the 1972 Contest 31.

Looking at performance, the 1966 Islander 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1966 Islander 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1966 Islander 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1966 Islander 33 and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1966 Islander 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1966 Islander 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1966 Islander 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS