1966 Islander 33 vs Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 — Comparison

1966 Islander 331966 Islander 33
VS
Beneteau Oceanis 40.1Beneteau Oceanis 40.1

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1966 Islander 33Beneteau Oceanis 40.1
General
ManufacturerIslanderBeneteau
Year1966–19742020
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerJoseph McGlassonMarc Lombard
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)12.28 m (40.3 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.78 m (35.4 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.99 m (13.1 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)70.2 m² (756 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)350 L (92.5 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1966 Islander 33
15.57
Beneteau Oceanis 40.1
17.12
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1966 Islander 33
39.99
Beneteau Oceanis 40.1
30.59
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1966 Islander 33
0.72
Beneteau Oceanis 40.1
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1966 Islander 33
23.44
Beneteau Oceanis 40.1
16.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1966 Islander 33 and Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1966 Islander 33 is a classic design by Islander from USA, while the Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1966 Islander 33 was penned by Joseph McGlasson. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 was designed by Marc Lombard.

In terms of size, the 1966 Islander 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 at 12.28m (40.3ft) with a 3.99m beam. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 is 2.22m longer than the 1966 Islander 33. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 displaces approximately 87% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1966 Islander 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1, with an SA/D of 17.12 and 70.2 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1966 Islander 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1966 Islander 33 and 30.6% for the Beneteau Oceanis 40.1, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1966 Islander 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1966 Islander 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Beneteau Oceanis 40.1 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1966 Islander 33 · Beneteau Oceanis 40.1