1967 Columbia 43 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1967 Columbia 431967 Columbia 43
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Columbia 431984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerColumbiaPearson
Year1967–19731984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam TrippWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA13.11 m (43.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area71.0 m² (764 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Columbia 43
16.05
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Columbia 43
42.86
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Columbia 43
0.67
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Columbia 43
24.24
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Columbia 43 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Columbia 43 is a classic design by Columbia from USA, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1967 Columbia 43 was penned by William Tripp. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1967 Columbia 43 measures 13.11m (43.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1967 Columbia 43 is 2.75m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34. The 1967 Columbia 43 displaces approximately 75% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Columbia 43 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.05 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1967 Columbia 43 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Columbia 43 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1967 Columbia 43 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Columbia 43 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Columbia 43 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1967 Columbia 43 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1967 Columbia 43 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Columbia 43 · 1984 Pearson 34