1967 Columbia 43 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1967 Columbia 431967 Columbia 43
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Columbia 43Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerColumbiaHanse
Year1967–19732006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerWilliam Trippjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA13.11 m (43.0 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area71.0 m² (764 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Columbia 43
16.05
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Columbia 43
42.86
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Columbia 43
0.67
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Columbia 43
24.24
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Columbia 43 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Columbia 43 is a classic design by Columbia from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1967 Columbia 43 was penned by William Tripp. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1967 Columbia 43 measures 13.11m (43.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1967 Columbia 43 is 2.81m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1967 Columbia 43 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Columbia 43 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.05 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Columbia 43 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1967 Columbia 43 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Columbia 43 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Columbia 43 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1967 Columbia 43 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Columbia 43 · Hanse 342