1967 Columbia 43 vs 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 — Comparison

1967 Columbia 431967 Columbia 43
VS
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Columbia 432009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
General
ManufacturerColumbiaBeneteau
Year1967–19732009–2013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam TrippFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA13.11 m (43.0 ft)10.44 m (34.3 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)5,550 kg (12,236 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area71.0 m² (764 ft²)51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Columbia 43
16.05
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
16.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Columbia 43
42.86
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
28.83
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Columbia 43
0.67
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Columbia 43
24.24
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
18.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Columbia 43 and 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Columbia 43 is a classic design by Columbia from USA, while the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is a 2000s offering from Beneteau from France. The 1967 Columbia 43 was penned by William Tripp. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1967 Columbia 43 measures 13.11m (43.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 at 10.44m (34.3ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 1967 Columbia 43 is 2.67m longer than the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34. The 1967 Columbia 43 displaces approximately 72% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Columbia 43 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.05 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, with an SA/D of 16.53 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Columbia 43 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1967 Columbia 43 and 28.8% for the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Columbia 43 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Columbia 43 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1967 Columbia 43 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Columbia 43 · 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34