1967 Columbia 43 vs Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 — Comparison

1967 Columbia 431967 Columbia 43
VS
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Columbia 43Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
General
ManufacturerColumbiaJeanneau
Year1967–19732019
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam TrippMarc Lombard
Dimensions
LOA13.11 m (43.0 ft)11.75 m (38.5 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,300 kg (5,071 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area71.0 m² (764 ft²)64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP29 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Columbia 43
16.05
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
16.82
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Columbia 43
42.86
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
30.26
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Columbia 43
0.67
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Columbia 43
24.24
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
17.14

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Columbia 43 and Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Columbia 43 is a classic design by Columbia from USA, while the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 is a modern offering from Jeanneau from France. The 1967 Columbia 43 was penned by William Tripp. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 was designed by Marc Lombard.

In terms of size, the 1967 Columbia 43 measures 13.11m (43.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 at 11.75m (38.5ft) with a 3.76m beam. The 1967 Columbia 43 is 1.36m longer than the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389. The 1967 Columbia 43 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Columbia 43 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.05 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389, with an SA/D of 16.82 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Columbia 43 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1967 Columbia 43 and 30.3% for the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Columbia 43 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 280L water and 160L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Columbia 43 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1967 Columbia 43 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Columbia 43 · Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389