1967 Pearson 35 vs 1979 Cal 39 — Comparison

1967 Pearson 35 1967 Pearson 35
VS
1979 Cal 39 1979 Cal 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1967 Pearson 35 1979 Cal 39
General
Manufacturer Pearson Cal
Year 1967–1973 1979–1985
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer William Shaw Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 48.6 m² (523 ft²) 63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 30 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Pearson 35
15.96
1979 Cal 39
15.78
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Pearson 35
41.67
1979 Cal 39
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Pearson 35
0.69
1979 Cal 39
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Pearson 35
26.00
1979 Cal 39
21.05

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Pearson 35 and 1979 Cal 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1979 Cal 39 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The 1979 Cal 39 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1979 Cal 39 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1979 Cal 39 is 1.22m longer than the 1967 Pearson 35. The 1979 Cal 39 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The 1979 Cal 39, with an SA/D of 15.78 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1967 Pearson 35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1979 Cal 39 has a comfort ratio of 21.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 41.7% for the 1979 Cal 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1979 Cal 39 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1967 Pearson 35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Cal 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS