1968 Alberg 35 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1968 Alberg 35
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1968 Alberg 351995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerVariousFeeling
Year1968–19781995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerCarl AlbergPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1968 Alberg 35
14.12
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1968 Alberg 35
41.67
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1968 Alberg 35
0.66
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1968 Alberg 35
27.81
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1968 Alberg 35 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Alberg 35 is a classic design by Various from USA, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1968 Alberg 35 was penned by Carl Alberg. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1968 Alberg 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 1.13m longer than the 1968 Alberg 35. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1968 Alberg 35 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.12 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1968 Alberg 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 27.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1968 Alberg 35 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1968 Alberg 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1968 Alberg 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1968 Alberg 35 · 1995 Feeling 39