1968 Pearson 26 vs 1984 Dehler 25 — Comparison
1968 Pearson 26
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1968 Pearson 26 | 1984 Dehler 25 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Dehler |
| Year | 1968–1975 | 1984–1992 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | William Shaw | E.G. van de Stadt |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.92 m (26.0 ft) | 7.50 m (24.6 ft) |
| LWL | 6.10 m (20.0 ft) | 6.30 m (20.7 ft) |
| Beam | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) | 2.50 m (8.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) | 1.35 m (4.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) | 1,800 kg (3,968 lbs) |
| Ballast | 862 kg (1,900 lbs) | 680 kg (1,499 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 27.0 m² (291 ft²) | 22.5 m² (242 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 8 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 30 L (7.9 gal) | 25 L (6.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 40 L (10.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 4 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1968 Pearson 26 and 1984 Dehler 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Pearson 26 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1984 Dehler 25 is a 1980s offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1968 Pearson 26 was penned by William Shaw. The 1984 Dehler 25 was designed by E.G. van de Stadt.
In terms of size, the 1968 Pearson 26 measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1984 Dehler 25 at 7.50m (24.6ft) with a 2.50m beam. The 1968 Pearson 26 is 0.42m longer than the 1984 Dehler 25. The 1968 Pearson 26 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1968 Pearson 26 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.06 and 27.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Dehler 25, with an SA/D of 15.46 and 22.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1968 Pearson 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1968 Pearson 26 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1984 Dehler 25 has a comfort ratio of 18.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 42.2% for the 1968 Pearson 26 and 37.8% for the 1984 Dehler 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1968 Pearson 26 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1984 Dehler 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 25L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1968 Pearson 26 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1968 Pearson 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1968 Pearson 26 · 1984 Dehler 25