1969 Cal 34 vs 1983 Freedom 36 — Comparison

1969 Cal 341969 Cal 34
VS
1983 Freedom 361983 Freedom 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1969 Cal 341983 Freedom 36
General
ManufacturerCalFreedom
Year1969–19751983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBill LapworthGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)49.0 m² (527 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Cal 34
16.01
1983 Freedom 36
14.88
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Cal 34
39.13
1983 Freedom 36
37.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Cal 34
0.70
1983 Freedom 36
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Cal 34
23.63
1983 Freedom 36
18.82

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Cal 34 and 1983 Freedom 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Cal 34 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the 1983 Freedom 36 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1969 Cal 34 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The 1983 Freedom 36 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1969 Cal 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1983 Freedom 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1983 Freedom 36 is 0.61m longer than the 1969 Cal 34. The 1983 Freedom 36 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Cal 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1983 Freedom 36, with an SA/D of 14.88 and 49.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1969 Cal 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Cal 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1983 Freedom 36 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 39.1% for the 1969 Cal 34 and 37.0% for the 1983 Freedom 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Cal 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1983 Freedom 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Cal 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1969 Cal 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1969 Cal 34 · 1983 Freedom 36