1969 Cal 34 vs Catalina 387 — Comparison

1969 Cal 341969 Cal 34
VS
Catalina 387Catalina 387

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1969 Cal 34Catalina 387
General
ManufacturerCalCatalina
Year1969–19751996–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBill LapworthGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.96 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Cal 34
16.01
Catalina 387
16.73
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Cal 34
39.13
Catalina 387
39.39
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Cal 34
0.70
Catalina 387
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Cal 34
23.63
Catalina 387
18.47

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Cal 34 and Catalina 387 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Cal 34 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Catalina 387 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1969 Cal 34 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Catalina 387 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1969 Cal 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 387 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The Catalina 387 is 1.22m longer than the 1969 Cal 34. The Catalina 387 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Cal 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The Catalina 387, with an SA/D of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 387 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Cal 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Catalina 387 has a comfort ratio of 18.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 39.1% for the 1969 Cal 34 and 39.4% for the Catalina 387, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Cal 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 387 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Cal 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 387 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 387 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1969 Cal 34 · Catalina 387