1969 Ericson 35 vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

1969 Ericson 35
VS
Catalina 270Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1969 Ericson 35Catalina 270
General
ManufacturerEricsonCatalina
Year1969–19761992–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBruce KingGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL7.92 m (26.0 ft)7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.6 m² (523 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Ericson 35
15.96
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Ericson 35
40.00
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Ericson 35
0.69
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Ericson 35
24.76
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Ericson 35 and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Ericson 35 is a classic design by Ericson from USA, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1969 Ericson 35 was penned by Bruce King. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1969 Ericson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1969 Ericson 35 is 2.36m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1969 Ericson 35 displaces approximately 135% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Ericson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Ericson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1969 Ericson 35 and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Ericson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Ericson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1969 Ericson 35 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1969 Ericson 35 · Catalina 270