1969 Ericson 35 vs 1994 Sabre 362 — Comparison

1969 Ericson 35 1969 Ericson 35
VS
1994 Sabre 362 1994 Sabre 362

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1969 Ericson 35 1994 Sabre 362
General
Manufacturer Ericson Sabre
Year 1969–1976 1994–2001
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Bruce King Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 7.92 m (26.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 2,540 kg (5,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 48.6 m² (523 ft²) 54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Ericson 35
15.96
1994 Sabre 362
16.39
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Ericson 35
40.00
1994 Sabre 362
41.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Ericson 35
0.69
1994 Sabre 362
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Ericson 35
24.76
1994 Sabre 362
18.79

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Ericson 35 and 1994 Sabre 362 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Ericson 35 is a classic design by Ericson from USA, while the 1994 Sabre 362 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1969 Ericson 35 was penned by Bruce King. The 1994 Sabre 362 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1969 Ericson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1994 Sabre 362 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1994 Sabre 362 is 0.30m longer than the 1969 Ericson 35. The 1994 Sabre 362 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Ericson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The 1994 Sabre 362, with an SA/D of 16.39 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Sabre 362 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Ericson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1994 Sabre 362 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1969 Ericson 35 and 41.5% for the 1994 Sabre 362, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Ericson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1994 Sabre 362 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Ericson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Sabre 362 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS