1969 Ericson 35 vs Hanse 388 — Comparison

1969 Ericson 35
VS
Hanse 388

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1969 Ericson 35Hanse 388
General
ManufacturerEricsonHanse
Year1969–19762017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerBruce Kingjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.40 m (37.4 ft)
LWL7.92 m (26.0 ft)10.34 m (33.9 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.73 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)7,200 kg (15,873 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.6 m² (523 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP29 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Ericson 35
15.96
Hanse 388
17.17
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Ericson 35
40.00
Hanse 388
30.56
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Ericson 35
0.69
Hanse 388
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Ericson 35
24.76
Hanse 388
16.86

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Ericson 35 and Hanse 388 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Ericson 35 is a classic design by Ericson from USA, while the Hanse 388 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1969 Ericson 35 was penned by Bruce King. The Hanse 388 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1969 Ericson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hanse 388 at 11.40m (37.4ft) with a 3.73m beam. The Hanse 388 is 0.73m longer than the 1969 Ericson 35. The Hanse 388 displaces approximately 32% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Ericson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The Hanse 388, with an SA/D of 17.17 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 388 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Ericson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The Hanse 388 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1969 Ericson 35 and 30.6% for the Hanse 388, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Ericson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hanse 388 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 140L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Ericson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 388 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1969 Ericson 35 · Hanse 388