1970 Bristol 32 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1970 Bristol 321970 Bristol 32
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1970 Bristol 321982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerBristolWesterly
Year1970–19771982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.2 m² (433 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Bristol 32
14.91
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Bristol 32
42.00
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Bristol 32
0.72
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Bristol 32
25.96
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Bristol 32 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1970 Bristol 32 is 0.25m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1970 Bristol 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1970 Bristol 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1970 Bristol 32 · 1982 Westerly Konsort