1970 Columbia 26 Mk II vs 1978 C&C 24 — Comparison

1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
VS
1978 C&C 241978 C&C 24

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1970 Columbia 26 Mk II1978 C&C 24
General
ManufacturerColumbiaC&C Yachts
Year1970–19751978–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerWilliam CrealockCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA7.92 m (26.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
LWL6.25 m (20.5 ft)6.10 m (20.0 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)
Ballast726 kg (1,601 lbs)612 kg (1,349 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area26.2 m² (282 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP7 HP
Fuel Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)19 L (5.0 gal)
Water Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
17.33
1978 C&C 24
18.64
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
38.11
1978 C&C 24
40.88
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
0.79
1978 C&C 24
0.85
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
19.58
1978 C&C 24
16.77

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 1978 C&C 24 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II is a 1970s design by Columbia from USA, while the 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II was penned by William Crealock. The 1978 C&C 24 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1978 C&C 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II is 0.60m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.33 and 26.2 m² of sail area. The 1978 C&C 24, with an SA/D of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1978 C&C 24 has a comfort ratio of 16.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.85. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 23L of fuel. The 1978 C&C 24 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II · 1978 C&C 24