1971 C&C 27 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1971 C&C 271971 C&C 27
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1971 C&C 271976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsC&C Yachts
Year1971–19751976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaCanada
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL6.55 m (21.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.0 m² (334 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1971 C&C 27
17.13
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1971 C&C 27
41.80
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1971 C&C 27
0.81
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1971 C&C 27
20.13
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1971 C&C 27 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1971 C&C 27 is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1971 C&C 27 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1971 C&C 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 1.83m longer than the 1971 C&C 27. The 1976 C&C 33 displaces approximately 82% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1971 C&C 27 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.13 and 31.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1971 C&C 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1971 C&C 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 41.8% for the 1971 C&C 27 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1971 C&C 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1971 C&C 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1971 C&C 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1976 C&C 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1971 C&C 27 · 1976 C&C 33