1971 Columbia 28 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

1971 Columbia 28 1971 Columbia 28
VS
1984 Moody 33 1984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1971 Columbia 28 1984 Moody 33
General
Manufacturer Columbia Moody
Year 1971–1977 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer William Crealock Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 6.86 m (22.5 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 2.74 m (9.0 ft) 3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast 1,089 kg (2,401 lbs) 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 31.2 m² (336 ft²) 44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 20 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1971 Columbia 28
16.26
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1971 Columbia 28
40.01
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1971 Columbia 28
0.79
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1971 Columbia 28
20.16
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1971 Columbia 28 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1971 Columbia 28 is a 1970s design by Columbia from USA, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1971 Columbia 28 was penned by William Crealock. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1971 Columbia 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 is 1.53m longer than the 1971 Columbia 28. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 91% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1971 Columbia 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.26 and 31.2 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1971 Columbia 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1971 Columbia 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1971 Columbia 28 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1971 Columbia 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1971 Columbia 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Moody 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS