1972 Contest 31 vs 1988 Najad 331 — Comparison

1972 Contest 31 1972 Contest 31
VS
1988 Najad 331 1988 Najad 331

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1972 Contest 31 1988 Najad 331
General
Manufacturer Contest Najad
Year 1972–1982 1988–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Netherlands Sweden
Designer Dick Zaal Judel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 8.38 m (27.5 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.18 m (10.4 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Ballast 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) 2,000 kg (4,409 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 39.5 m² (425 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 80 L (21.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
1988 Najad 331
15.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
1988 Najad 331
40.82
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
1988 Najad 331
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
1988 Najad 331
20.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 1988 Najad 331 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1988 Najad 331 is a 1980s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1988 Najad 331 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1988 Najad 331 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.18m beam. The 1988 Najad 331 is 0.61m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1988 Najad 331 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 1988 Najad 331, with an SA/D of 15.15 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Najad 331 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1988 Najad 331 has a comfort ratio of 20.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 40.8% for the 1988 Najad 331, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1988 Najad 331 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Najad 331 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS