1972 Morgan 34 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

1972 Morgan 341972 Morgan 34
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Morgan 341996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerMorganNajad
Year1972–19781996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerCharley MorganJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Morgan 34
15.63
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Morgan 34
41.53
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Morgan 34
0.72
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Morgan 34
24.55
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Morgan 34 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Morgan 34 is a 1970s design by Morgan from USA, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1972 Morgan 34 was penned by Charley Morgan. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1972 Morgan 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 1.19m longer than the 1972 Morgan 34. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Morgan 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Morgan 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1972 Morgan 34 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Morgan 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Morgan 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Morgan 34 · 1996 Najad 380