1974 C&C 35 Mk II vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

1974 C&C 35 Mk II
VS
Catalina 270Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 C&C 35 Mk IICatalina 270
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsCatalina
Year1974–19791992–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
17.26
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
43.48
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
0.75
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
20.76
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is 2.36m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II displaces approximately 126% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 C&C 35 Mk II · Catalina 270