1974 C&C 35 Mk II vs Hunter 260 — Comparison

1974 C&C 35 Mk II 1974 C&C 35 Mk II
VS
Hunter 260 Hunter 260

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1974 C&C 35 Mk II Hunter 260
General
Manufacturer C&C Yachts Hunter
Year 1974–1979 1998–2004
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Canada USA
Designer Cuthbertson & Cassian Glenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 7.85 m (25.8 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 6.86 m (22.5 ft)
Beam 3.25 m (10.7 ft) 2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Ballast 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 771 kg (1,700 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.1 m² (550 ft²) 27.5 m² (296 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
17.26
Hunter 260
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
43.48
Hunter 260
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
0.75
Hunter 260
0.87
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
20.76
Hunter 260
15.99

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is 2.82m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II displaces approximately 156% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 260 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 260 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS