1974 C&C 35 Mk II vs Hunter 380 — Comparison

1974 C&C 35 Mk II 1974 C&C 35 Mk II
VS
Hunter 380 Hunter 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1974 C&C 35 Mk II Hunter 380
General
Manufacturer C&C Yachts Hunter
Year 1974–1979 2001–2005
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Canada USA
Designer Cuthbertson & Cassian Glenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam 3.25 m (10.7 ft) 3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs) 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.1 m² (550 ft²) 64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
17.26
Hunter 380
17.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
43.48
Hunter 380
37.51
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
0.75
Hunter 380
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
20.76
Hunter 380
17.27

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Hunter 380 is 0.91m longer than the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II. The Hunter 380 displaces approximately 39% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS