1975 C&C 30 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

1975 C&C 301975 C&C 30
VS
Hunter 280Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1975 C&C 30Hunter 280
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsHunter
Year1975–19801998–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL7.92 m (26.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.8 m² (450 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 C&C 30
17.27
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 C&C 30
41.18
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 C&C 30
0.80
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 C&C 30
18.72
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 C&C 30 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 C&C 30 is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1975 C&C 30 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1975 C&C 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The 1975 C&C 30 is 0.61m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1975 C&C 30 displaces approximately 49% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 C&C 30 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.27 and 41.8 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 C&C 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 C&C 30 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 C&C 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 C&C 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 C&C 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1975 C&C 30 · Hunter 280