1975 Pearson 39 vs 2004 Oyster 46 — Comparison

1975 Pearson 391975 Pearson 39
VS
2004 Oyster 462004 Oyster 46

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1975 Pearson 392004 Oyster 46
General
ManufacturerPearsonOyster
Year1975–19802004–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUnited Kingdom
DesignerWilliam ShawRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA11.89 m (39.0 ft)14.02 m (46.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)11.60 m (38.1 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)4.20 m (13.8 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.05 m (6.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)4,800 kg (10,582 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.8 m² (654 ft²)90.0 m² (969 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Pearson 39
15.83
2004 Oyster 46
16.97
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Pearson 39
41.17
2004 Oyster 46
38.40
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Pearson 39
0.71
2004 Oyster 46
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Pearson 39
21.46
2004 Oyster 46
18.69

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Pearson 39 and 2004 Oyster 46 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 39 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 2004 Oyster 46 is a 2000s offering from Oyster from United Kingdom. The 1975 Pearson 39 was penned by William Shaw. The 2004 Oyster 46 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2004 Oyster 46 at 14.02m (46.0ft) with a 4.20m beam. The 2004 Oyster 46 is 2.13m longer than the 1975 Pearson 39. The 2004 Oyster 46 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The 2004 Oyster 46, with an SA/D of 16.97 and 90.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2004 Oyster 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2004 Oyster 46 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 Pearson 39 and 38.4% for the 2004 Oyster 46, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2004 Oyster 46 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2004 Oyster 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1975 Pearson 39 · 2004 Oyster 46