1975 Pearson 39 vs 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 — Comparison

1975 Pearson 391975 Pearson 39
VS
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1975 Pearson 392009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
General
ManufacturerPearsonBeneteau
Year1975–19802009–2013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam ShawFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA11.89 m (39.0 ft)10.44 m (34.3 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)5,550 kg (12,236 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.8 m² (654 ft²)51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Pearson 39
15.83
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
16.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Pearson 39
41.17
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
28.83
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Pearson 39
0.71
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Pearson 39
21.46
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
18.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Pearson 39 and 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 39 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is a 2000s offering from Beneteau from France. The 1975 Pearson 39 was penned by William Shaw. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 at 10.44m (34.3ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 1975 Pearson 39 is 1.45m longer than the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34. The 1975 Pearson 39 displaces approximately 39% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, with an SA/D of 16.53 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 Pearson 39 and 28.8% for the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 Pearson 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1975 Pearson 39 · 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34