1977 Bristol 29.9 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

1977 Bristol 29.9 1977 Bristol 29.9
VS
1990 Feeling 32 1990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1977 Bristol 29.9 1990 Feeling 32
General
Manufacturer Bristol Feeling
Year 1977–1984 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Halsey Herreshoff Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 9.12 m (29.9 ft) 9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL 7.32 m (24.0 ft) 8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 39.7 m² (427 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1977 Bristol 29.9
16.41
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1977 Bristol 29.9
41.18
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1977 Bristol 29.9
0.76
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1977 Bristol 29.9
22.50
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1977 Bristol 29.9 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 measures 9.12m (29.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 0.73m longer than the 1977 Bristol 29.9. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.41 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1977 Bristol 29.9 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Bristol 29.9 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1977 Bristol 29.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS