1978 Bristol 40 vs 2007 Elan 310 — Comparison

1978 Bristol 401978 Bristol 40
VS
2007 Elan 310

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Bristol 402007 Elan 310
General
ManufacturerBristolElan
Year1978–19832007–2012
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerTed HoodRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.34 m (30.6 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.10 m (26.6 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)1,300 kg (2,866 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Bristol 40
15.63
2007 Elan 310
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Bristol 40
41.67
2007 Elan 310
28.89
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Bristol 40
0.67
2007 Elan 310
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Bristol 40
24.80
2007 Elan 310
21.35

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Bristol 40 and 2007 Elan 310 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Bristol 40 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 2007 Elan 310 is a 2000s offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1978 Bristol 40 was penned by Ted Hood. The 2007 Elan 310 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1978 Bristol 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2007 Elan 310 at 9.34m (30.6ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1978 Bristol 40 is 2.85m longer than the 2007 Elan 310. The 1978 Bristol 40 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Bristol 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The 2007 Elan 310, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2007 Elan 310 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Bristol 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 2007 Elan 310 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1978 Bristol 40 and 28.9% for the 2007 Elan 310, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Bristol 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2007 Elan 310 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Bristol 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2007 Elan 310 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1978 Bristol 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Bristol 40 · 2007 Elan 310