1978 Bristol 40 vs 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 — Comparison

1978 Bristol 40 1978 Bristol 40
VS
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1978 Bristol 40 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
General
Manufacturer Bristol X-Yachts
Year 1978–1983 2012–2018
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Denmark
Designer Ted Hood Niels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA 12.19 m (40.0 ft) 12.73 m (41.8 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 10.90 m (35.8 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.93 m (12.9 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs) 3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 62.4 m² (672 ft²) 79.0 m² (850 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 300 L (79.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Bristol 40
15.63
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
17.52
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Bristol 40
41.67
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
36.73
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Bristol 40
0.67
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Bristol 40
24.80
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
18.55

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Bristol 40 and 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Bristol 40 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1978 Bristol 40 was penned by Ted Hood. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1978 Bristol 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 at 12.73m (41.8ft) with a 3.93m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is 0.54m longer than the 1978 Bristol 40. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Bristol 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42, with an SA/D of 17.52 and 79.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Bristol 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has a comfort ratio of 18.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1978 Bristol 40 and 36.7% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Bristol 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Bristol 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS