1978 Bristol 40 vs Hanse 470 — Comparison

1978 Bristol 401978 Bristol 40
VS
Hanse 470

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Bristol 40Hanse 470
General
ManufacturerBristolHanse
Year1978–19832013–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerTed Hoodjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)14.45 m (47.4 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)12.85 m (42.2 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)4.42 m (14.5 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.25 m (7.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)11,800 kg (26,015 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)430 L (113.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths710
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Bristol 40
15.63
Hanse 470
18.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Bristol 40
41.67
Hanse 470
31.36
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Bristol 40
0.67
Hanse 470
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Bristol 40
24.80
Hanse 470
14.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Bristol 40 and Hanse 470 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Bristol 40 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the Hanse 470 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1978 Bristol 40 was penned by Ted Hood. The Hanse 470 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1978 Bristol 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Hanse 470 at 14.45m (47.4ft) with a 4.42m beam. The Hanse 470 is 2.26m longer than the 1978 Bristol 40. The Hanse 470 displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Bristol 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The Hanse 470, with an SA/D of 18.81 and 96.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 470 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Bristol 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The Hanse 470 has a comfort ratio of 14.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1978 Bristol 40 and 31.4% for the Hanse 470, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Bristol 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hanse 470 offers 10 berths in 3 cabins with 430L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Bristol 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 470 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 470 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Bristol 40 · Hanse 470