1978 Bristol 40 vs Bavaria C42 — Comparison

1978 Bristol 401978 Bristol 40
VS
Bavaria C42Bavaria C42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Bristol 40Bavaria C42
General
ManufacturerBristolBavaria
Year1978–19832018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerTed Hoodcossutti yacht design
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)12.88 m (42.3 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.25 m (36.9 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)4.09 m (13.4 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)8,900 kg (19,621 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)2,750 kg (6,063 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP45 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Bristol 40
15.63
Bavaria C42
17.98
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Bristol 40
41.67
Bavaria C42
30.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Bristol 40
0.67
Bavaria C42
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Bristol 40
24.80
Bavaria C42
15.20

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Bristol 40 and Bavaria C42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Bristol 40 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the Bavaria C42 is a modern offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1978 Bristol 40 was penned by Ted Hood. The Bavaria C42 was designed by cossutti yacht design.

In terms of size, the 1978 Bristol 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Bavaria C42 at 12.88m (42.3ft) with a 4.09m beam. The Bavaria C42 is 0.69m longer than the 1978 Bristol 40. The Bavaria C42 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Bristol 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The Bavaria C42, with an SA/D of 17.98 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria C42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Bristol 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The Bavaria C42 has a comfort ratio of 15.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1978 Bristol 40 and 30.9% for the Bavaria C42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Bristol 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Bavaria C42 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Bristol 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria C42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria C42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Bristol 40 · Bavaria C42