1978 Cape Dory 270 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1978 Cape Dory 270
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Cape Dory 2701976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerCape DoryC&C Yachts
Year1978–19851976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerCarl AlbergCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL6.40 m (21.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.14 m (3.7 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area28.0 m² (301 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Cape Dory 270
14.60
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Cape Dory 270
41.66
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Cape Dory 270
0.74
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Cape Dory 270
24.39
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Cape Dory 270 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is a 1970s design by Cape Dory from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 was penned by Carl Alberg. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1978 Cape Dory 270 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 1.83m longer than the 1978 Cape Dory 270. The 1976 C&C 33 displaces approximately 67% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Cape Dory 270 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.60 and 28.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1976 C&C 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Cape Dory 270 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1978 Cape Dory 270 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Cape Dory 270 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 C&C 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1976 C&C 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Cape Dory 270 · 1976 C&C 33