1978 Catalina 25 vs Hunter 170 — Comparison

1978 Catalina 25 1978 Catalina 25
VS
Hunter 170 Hunter 170

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1978 Catalina 25 Hunter 170
General
Manufacturer Catalina Hunter
Year 1978–1991 1996–2009
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Frank Butler Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 5.18 m (17.0 ft)
LWL 6.40 m (21.0 ft) 4.57 m (15.0 ft)
Beam 2.44 m (8.0 ft) 1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 0.84 m (2.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) 295 kg (650 lbs)
Ballast 748 kg (1,649 lbs) 59 kg (130 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 26.1 m² (281 ft²) 11.2 m² (121 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Centerboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5
Cabins 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Catalina 25
17.26
Hunter 170
25.70
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Catalina 25
39.27
Hunter 170
20.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Catalina 25
0.79
Hunter 170
1.19
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Catalina 25
19.50
Hunter 170
8.08

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Catalina 25 and Hunter 170 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Catalina 25 is a 1970s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 170 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1978 Catalina 25 was penned by Frank Butler. The Hunter 170 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1978 Catalina 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the Hunter 170 at 5.18m (17.0ft) with a 1.98m beam. The 1978 Catalina 25 is 2.44m longer than the Hunter 170. The 1978 Catalina 25 displaces approximately 546% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Catalina 25 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 26.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 170, with an SA/D of 25.70 and 11.2 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The Hunter 170 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Catalina 25 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hunter 170 has a comfort ratio of 8.1 and a capsize screening value of 1.19. The ballast ratios are 39.3% for the 1978 Catalina 25 and 20.0% for the Hunter 170, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Catalina 25 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 170 offers an unspecified number of berths with unspecified water tankage and unspecified fuel.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Catalina 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 170 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS