1978 C&C 24 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1978 C&C 241978 C&C 24
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 C&C 241983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsIrwin
Year1978–19831983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA7.32 m (24.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL6.10 m (20.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast612 kg (1,349 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area24.0 m² (258 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine7 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity19 L (5.0 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 C&C 24
18.64
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 C&C 24
40.88
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 C&C 24
0.85
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 C&C 24
16.77
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 C&C 24 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1978 C&C 24 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1978 C&C 24 measures 7.32m (24.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 is 2.43m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 233% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 C&C 24 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 C&C 24 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 C&C 24 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 C&C 24 · 1983 Irwin 32