1979 Westerly Fulmar vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Westerly Fulmar1982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerWesterlyWesterly
Year1979–19861982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUK
DesignerEd DuboisEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL8.00 m (26.2 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity136 L (35.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is 0.25m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1982 Westerly Konsort has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Westerly Konsort has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Westerly Fulmar · 1982 Westerly Konsort