1979 Westerly Fulmar vs 2007 Elan 310 — Comparison

1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar
VS
2007 Elan 310

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Westerly Fulmar2007 Elan 310
General
ManufacturerWesterlyElan
Year1979–19862007–2012
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKSlovenia
DesignerEd DuboisRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.34 m (30.6 ft)
LWL8.00 m (26.2 ft)8.10 m (26.6 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,300 kg (2,866 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity136 L (35.9 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
2007 Elan 310
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
2007 Elan 310
28.89
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
2007 Elan 310
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41
2007 Elan 310
21.35

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 2007 Elan 310 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s design by Westerly from UK, while the 2007 Elan 310 is a 2000s offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was penned by Ed Dubois. The 2007 Elan 310 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 2007 Elan 310 at 9.34m (30.6ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is 0.41m longer than the 2007 Elan 310. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 2007 Elan 310, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2007 Elan 310 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2007 Elan 310 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 28.9% for the 2007 Elan 310, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2007 Elan 310 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2007 Elan 310 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Westerly Fulmar · 2007 Elan 310