1980 Contest 33 vs 1985 Contest 36 — Comparison

1980 Contest 33 1980 Contest 33
VS
1985 Contest 36 1985 Contest 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1980 Contest 33 1985 Contest 36
General
Manufacturer Contest Contest
Year 1980–1990 1985–1995
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Netherlands Netherlands
Designer Dick Zaal Dick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
Beam 3.20 m (10.5 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.60 m (5.2 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) 6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)
Ballast 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs) 2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 44.0 m² (474 ft²) 54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Steel
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Contest 33
14.90
1985 Contest 36
15.75
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Contest 33
40.38
1985 Contest 36
41.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Contest 33
0.74
1985 Contest 36
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Contest 33
22.02
1985 Contest 36
21.78

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Contest 33 and 1985 Contest 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1985 Contest 36 is a 1980s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1980 Contest 33 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1985 Contest 36 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1980 Contest 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1985 Contest 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1985 Contest 36 is 0.91m longer than the 1980 Contest 33. The 1985 Contest 36 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Contest 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1985 Contest 36, with an SA/D of 15.75 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1985 Contest 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Contest 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1985 Contest 36 has a comfort ratio of 21.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33 and 41.5% for the 1985 Contest 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Contest 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1985 Contest 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Contest 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1985 Contest 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS