1980 Contest 33 vs 1988 Najad 331 — Comparison

1980 Contest 331980 Contest 33
VS
1988 Najad 331

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 Contest 331988 Najad 331
General
ManufacturerContestNajad
Year1980–19901988–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsSweden
DesignerDick ZaalJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.38 m (27.5 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.18 m (10.4 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)2,000 kg (4,409 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Contest 33
14.90
1988 Najad 331
15.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Contest 33
40.38
1988 Najad 331
40.82
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Contest 33
0.74
1988 Najad 331
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Contest 33
22.02
1988 Najad 331
20.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Contest 33 and 1988 Najad 331 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1988 Najad 331 is a 1980s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1980 Contest 33 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1988 Najad 331 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1980 Contest 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1988 Najad 331 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.18m beam. The 1980 Contest 33 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Contest 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Najad 331, with an SA/D of 15.15 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Najad 331 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Contest 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1988 Najad 331 has a comfort ratio of 20.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33 and 40.8% for the 1988 Najad 331, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Contest 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1988 Najad 331 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Contest 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Najad 331 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1980 Contest 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 Contest 33 · 1988 Najad 331