1980 Contest 33 vs 1988 Westerly Corsair — Comparison

1980 Contest 331980 Contest 33
VS
1988 Westerly Corsair1988 Westerly Corsair

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 Contest 331988 Westerly Corsair
General
ManufacturerContestWesterly
Year1980–19901988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUK
DesignerDick ZaalEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)11.00 m (36.1 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.50 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)2,450 kg (5,401 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)50.0 m² (538 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Contest 33
14.90
1988 Westerly Corsair
14.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Contest 33
40.38
1988 Westerly Corsair
38.58
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Contest 33
0.74
1988 Westerly Corsair
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Contest 33
22.02
1988 Westerly Corsair
19.55

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Contest 33 and 1988 Westerly Corsair represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1988 Westerly Corsair is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1980 Contest 33 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1988 Westerly Corsair was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1980 Contest 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1988 Westerly Corsair at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.50m beam. The 1988 Westerly Corsair is 0.94m longer than the 1980 Contest 33. The 1988 Westerly Corsair displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Contest 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Westerly Corsair, with an SA/D of 14.81 and 50.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1980 Contest 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Contest 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1988 Westerly Corsair has a comfort ratio of 19.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33 and 38.6% for the 1988 Westerly Corsair, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Contest 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1988 Westerly Corsair offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Contest 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 Contest 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Westerly Corsair offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 Contest 33 · 1988 Westerly Corsair