1980 CS 33 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

1980 CS 33 1980 CS 33
VS
Hunter 27 Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1980 CS 33 Hunter 27
General
Manufacturer CS Yachts Hunter
Year 1980–1987 1992–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Canada USA
Designer Ray Wall Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam 3.20 m (10.5 ft) 2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 49.1 m² (529 ft²) 33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 12 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The 1980 CS 33 is 1.83m longer than the Hunter 27. The 1980 CS 33 displaces approximately 91% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1980 CS 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS