1980 CS 33 vs 2004 Najad 405 — Comparison

1980 CS 33
VS
2004 Najad 405

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 CS 332004 Najad 405
General
ManufacturerCS YachtsNajad
Year1980–19872004–2012
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaSweden
DesignerRay WallJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)12.40 m (40.7 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.1 m² (529 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)350 L (92.5 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
2004 Najad 405
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
2004 Najad 405
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
2004 Najad 405
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
2004 Najad 405
19.60

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and 2004 Najad 405 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the 2004 Najad 405 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The 2004 Najad 405 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 2004 Najad 405 at 12.40m (40.7ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2004 Najad 405 is 2.34m longer than the 1980 CS 33. The 2004 Najad 405 displaces approximately 93% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The 2004 Najad 405, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2004 Najad 405 has a comfort ratio of 19.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 39.1% for the 2004 Najad 405, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2004 Najad 405 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 350L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2004 Najad 405 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 CS 33 · 2004 Najad 405